|
Go direct to the body of www.creationtheory.com Evaluate for yourself - from the pages of www.creationtheory.com Young Earth Creationism - is it biblical? Darwinism, or common descent - is it scientific? Was Owen correct all along? Solar System Origin - the scientists have reached a dead end Expanding Universe - line and verse from Genesis Climate Moderation - something a little more complicated than smoke belching from a chimney Extinctions - a mystery Age of Man - how could we have been here for millions of years, when we have totally altered the world in a thousand? Snakes, Virus's & Other Agents of Pain & Destruction - why? Noah's Flood - it didn't shape the world's strata, but we now have an idea of the likely cause. Why, Why, Why? - what is the purpose of the universe? Free Speech Blog - furthering democracy and free speech. Upholding the Australian Constitution - administration to be based on objective truth. Religions such as Islam, which militates for Sharia law, must not get control of Western systems of government. |
|
Recent Tropics |
|
Some scientists are with it, some are without it! Science is not the product of feelings, emotions or the latest majority opinion. For centuries it was assumed that some objects fall faster than others. Galileo investigated this proposition and found (eliminating the factor of air resistance) that it was untrue. It often happens that commonly accepted 'facts' turn out to be the product of groupthink rather than reality. Extract from
the journal Science, with quotations from ScienceDaily. Quote, "All life evolved from a single-celled universal common ancestor" Professor ... said: "These fossils force us to rethink our ideas of how animals learned to make large bodies out of cells." Some scientists are with it, and some scientists are walking about on the ceiling. The facts are that life was revealed over time. How was it revealed? By super-intelligent slimeballs? By magical events involving microbes? Note the complete absence of any systematic analysis of the question in hand. Their explanation is: Nature did it. In this case nature must equal God and science by definition equals Animism, the worship of nature. What would Galileo have thought of these dreamings from the land of never-never? When is science going to follow its own guidelines? |
|
NEW ADVANCES IN ORIGINS SCIENCE Sir Richard Owen Goes to the Top
of the Class! SCIENCEDAILY reporting on University of Nottingham
Sir Richard Owen thought that species were a modification of an archetype, or in modern information terminology, a mastercode. He advised Darwin & Co to think again. This was before Darwin published On The Origin of Species and before we had modern I.T.. For more about Owen's genius, Evolution of Evolution, Owen A#1.
|
|
MORE NEWS CreationTheory.com publications pre-empt the findings of the space probe Messenger and the space retrieval programme Genesis. It is also confidently predicted that the sun will be shown to be a sophisticated heat metering device which is sensitive to feedback from the earth's magnetic field. To evaluate the Genesis and Messenger claims, follow this link. For the prediction about the Sun, go here. More about climate here. |
Professor
Natalio Krasnogor of the University's School of Computer Science,
who leads the Interdisciplinary Computing and Complex Systems Research
Group, said: "We are looking at creating a cell's equivalent
to a computer operating system in such a way that a given group
of cells could be seamlessly re-programmed to perform any function
without needing to modify its hardware."